Unlocking the Potential of Data Value for Trustworthy AI: Addressing Current Research Gaps.
This article delves into the field of data value for trustworthy AI, discussing the current research gaps and potential solutions to ensure the reliability, robustness and explainability of AI systems while promoting accountability, transparency, and fairness. The research gaps discussed include lack of clear definitions and metrics, limited understanding of ethical, legal and societal implications, and inadequate consideration of data governance.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly becoming a key driver of technological progress and innovation, with applications in a wide range of industries and domains. However, as AI systems become more sophisticated and integrated into our lives, there is a growing need to ensure that they are trustworthy and align with our values and ethical principles. This is where the concept of data value for trustworthy AI comes in.
Data value for trustworthy AI refers to the ways in which data can be used to ensure the reliability, robustness, and explainability of AI systems, as well as to promote accountability, transparency, and fairness. However, despite the growing importance of data value for trustworthy AI, there are several current research gaps in this field that need to be addressed.
One of the major research gaps in data value for trustworthy AI is the lack of clear definitions and metrics for measuring the trustworthiness of AI systems. This makes it difficult to evaluate and compare different systems, and to assess the effectiveness of different approaches to data value.
Another important research gap is the limited understanding of the ethical, legal, and societal implications of AI and how they relate to data value. For example, there is a need for more research on how to ensure that AI systems are aligned with our values and ethical principles, and on how to mitigate the potential negative consequences of AI.
In addition, there is a lack of attention to the needs and perspectives of marginalized and underrepresented groups in the design and deployment of AI systems. This can lead to AI systems that perpetuate existing biases and discrimination, rather than promoting fairness and equity.
Another key research gap is the limited understanding of the impact of AI on the workforce and potential solutions for mitigating negative effects. As AI systems become more prevalent, there is a need to understand how they will affect the nature of work and the skills required, as well as to develop strategies for ensuring that workers are not left behind.
Furthermore, there is a lack of research on the role of data governance in ensuring the trustworthiness of AI systems. Data governance refers to the processes and policies that govern the collection, use, and sharing of data, and it is crucial for ensuring that data is used in a responsible and ethical way.
Another important research gap is the limited understanding of the long-term implications of AI on society and the need for proactive measures to address potential negative consequences. As AI systems become more integrated into our lives, there is a need to anticipate and plan for the long-term impact of these systems on society and to develop strategies for mitigating any negative effects.
Another important research gap is the lack of research on how to balance the need for data privacy and security with the need for data access and sharing for AI development and deployment. As AI systems become more reliant on data, there is a growing need to ensure that data is used in a responsible and ethical way, while also protecting individuals’ privacy and security.
Finally, there is a limited understanding of how to effectively communicate and explain the inner workings and decision-making processes of AI systems to different stakeholders. This includes researchers, developers, policymakers, and the general public, and it is crucial for building trust and confidence in AI systems.
Data value for trustworthy AI is an important and growing area of research that has the potential to ensure that AI systems are reliable, robust, and explainable, and that they align with our values and ethical principles. However, there are several current research gaps in this field that need to be addressed, including the lack of clear definitions and metrics for measuring the trustworthiness of AI systems, the limited understanding of the ethical, legal, and societal implications of AI, and the lack of attention to the needs.
- Domingos, P. (2015). A Few Useful Things to Know About Machine Learning. Communications of the ACM, 58(7), 78–87.
- Mitchell, T. (1997). Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill.
- Chollet, F. (2018). Deep Learning with Python. Shelter Island, NY: Manning Publications Co.
- Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444.
- Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall.
- Shalev-Shwartz, S., & Ben-David, S. (2014). Understanding Machine Learning: From Theory to Algorithms. New York: Springer.
- Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (2018). Reinforcement learning: An introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Witten, I., Frank, E., Hall, M., & Pal, C. (2016). Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
- Zeng, H., Chen, Y., & Liu, Y. (2018). A survey on trustworthy artificial intelligence. IEEE Access, 6, 69138–69153.